Number of IS 3 tanks produced. Military review and politics

All about protection devices

The development of the IS-3 tank, or as it was also called “Kirovets-1,” began in the summer of 1944. Part of this tank, namely the turret, was designed at the design bureau of the Chelyabinsk Kirov Plant, chief engineer and designer M.F. Balzhi.

A special feature of the tank from Balzhi was a non-standard design solution, based on a study of damage to damaged Soviet IS-2 tanks, in the design of the turret, namely its low silhouette and shape, which, in combination with strong frontal armor, was a very formidable weapon. Initially, the hull of the IS-3 tank was different from its successor. To this day, only one photograph of the tank designed at the Chelyabinsk Kirov Plant has survived.

Now let's move to Experimental Plant No. 100, headed by Zh.Ya. Kotin. As soon as Kotin learned that ChKZ was creating new tank, a decree was issued on his behalf on the preparation of a project for an experimental tank that could compete with ChKZ.

It was decided to make the body of the future tank from the top two plates of rolled, homogeneous armor at an angle of 56° and a rotation of 43°, and in the middle it was covered with a small roof, triangular in shape (yes, we are talking about the body) at an angle of 73°, in The driver's hatch was located there. The lower armor plate was located at an angle of 63°. Then this arrangement of armor plates began to be called “pike nose” because of their similarity.

Unfortunately, information about the tower produced by Experimental Plant No. 100 has not been preserved; no samples were built.

So, two projects were sent for approval to the People's Commissar of the Tank Industry V.A. Malyshev. After reviewing both, it was decided to take the tower from the design of M.F. Balzhi, and the body from the design of Zh.Ya. Kotin. It should be noted that the director of ChKZ I.M. Zaltsman, when writing a decree on the construction of a prototype, called the tank “Pobeda”, but this name was rejected in favor of the name of the IS-3 tank.

The tests took place under the supervision of Marshal of the USSR Tank Forces P.A. Rotmistrov. At the end of the tests, he personally got into the tank and said the words:

This is the kind of car the army needs!


After the tests, Marshal Zhukov and Vasilevsky presented the project to I.V. Stalin, who signed a document on its adoption and production at ChKZ.

Tank armament

The IS-3 tank was equipped with a D-25T gun of the 1943 model with a 122mm caliber and a coaxial DT machine gun. The gun had a muzzle brake. The initial flight speed of the armor-piercing projectile was 781 m/s.
With the help of a telescopic sight, the aimed shooting range could be 5000 meters.
The gun's rate of fire was approximately 2 rounds per minute, and with a trained crew it reached 3 rounds per minute. The gun's ammunition consisted of 18 high-explosive fragmentation shells and 10 armor-piercing shells, which made a total of 28 (interestingly, for ease of training of loaders, the armor-piercing shell was painted black, and the rest were painted steel gray.)
The first batch of tanks rolled off the assembly line in May 1945.

Service record of the IS-3 tank

IS 3 heavy tanks did not take part during the .
The IS-3 was first shown at the Berlin WWII Allied Forces Parade on September 7, 1945. The IS-3 shown then against the backdrop of American Pershings was simply magnificent; the Red Army then made it clear that they were not fools and could once again march around Europe.

The IS-3 heavy tank was actively used by Soviet troops during the suppression of the Hungarian uprising of 1956.
The IS-3 was also used by Egypt in the six-day war against Israel, but even then the IS-3 was inferior in terms of performance characteristics to such tanks as the M48 and Centurion.

IS-3 modifications

Despite the fact that the tank was produced for only one year from 1945 to 1946, several more upgrades of this tank were produced:
IS-3K - Usually in Soviet and Russian armored forces the letter K indicates that the tank is a command tank. In the case of the IS-3K, it is supplemented with the R-112 radio station.
IS-3M - This is a more serious modernization, in which parts were replaced and some errors of the previous version were corrected, namely:

  • Strengthened the commander's (rotating) hatch
  • Night vision device for the driver
  • Replacing the engine with another, more reliable one. Engine power has not been changed.
  • The support roller and idler wheel assemblies are reinforced.
  • “Electrification” of the tank, from the emergency lighting circuit to the electric heater.
  • Replaced the DShK machine gun with the DSh KM, and the DT machine gun with the DTM
  • Installation of radios with IS-3K and new intercoms.

IS-3MK - supplemented with another radio station R-112

Vehicles developed on the basis of the IS-3

Object 704, also known as ISU model 1945, was developed on the basis of the IS-3, but did not go into production.

Also, based on the IS-3 heavy tank, a missile tank called “Object 757” was developed. The tank did not pass the test; preference was given to another tank, the Object 772, but it was also not built. Subsequently, it was decided to abandon the concept of creating a heavy missile tank.
A total of 2,311 IS-3 tanks and its modifications were produced. The tank was in service with the regular armies of some countries until 1993

The development of a project for a new heavy tank, which was significantly superior to the serially produced IS-2 in terms of armor protection, began in accordance with GKO Decree No. 5583 of April 8, 1944 and had its own background. A group of researchers from the Military Academy of Mechanization and Motorization named after I.V. Stalin, headed by engineer-colonel A. Zavyalov, studied the nature of the damage caused by shells hitting tanks at the sites of the tank battles of the Battle of Kursk. It turned out that not all parts of the turret and hull were affected equally: the frontal parts suffered more, and the number of hits to the turret was greatest. The result of these studies was the design of a new tank.

All design work was carried out under conditions of fierce competition between two design teams - Experimental Plant No. 100, organized in March 1942 and headed by Zh.Ya. Kotin and A.S. Ermolaev, who sought to confirm their leadership in the development of heavy tanks, and the design bureau of the Chelyabinsk Kirov Plant, led by N.L. Dukhov and M.F. Balzhi, who hoped to show their maturity and independence.

The main feature of the project proposed by the Chelyabinsk plant was the original flattened turret with a 122-mm D-25 cannon, developed by designer G.V. Kruchenykh. The large angles of inclination of the armored walls of the turret contributed to the ricochet of armor-piercing shells, and the successful internal layout ensured its minimal dimensions, which made it possible to increase the thickness of the frontal armor to 250 mm without unnecessarily making the vehicle heavier, versus 100 mm on the heavy IS-2 tank.

Zh.Ya.Kotin prepared his own version, based on the developments of the Pilot Plant for objects 244, 245 and 248, in which the unusual shape of the bow of the hull was immediately noticeable. The fact is that on almost all tanks of that period, the upper frontal part of both welded and cast hulls was a surface placed perpendicular to the longitudinal plane or at a slight angle to the vertical. This shape was necessary as long as there were two people sitting in the front of the tank. With the exclusion of the gunner-radio operator from the crew, when there was only one driver left in front, moreover, seated in the center, it became possible to cut corners on the front plate. Thus, on the IS-2, “cheekbones” appeared in the cast frontal part. At the same time, it became possible not only to reduce the weight of the hull, but also to significantly increase the durability of armor parts in the event of shelling of the tank from the front. The designers of the Experimental Plant G.N. Moskvin and V.I. Tarotko proposed to compose the entire upper frontal part of the hull from two armor plates connected and strongly inclined to the vertical plane, rotated in plan at a large angle. These sheets were covered on top with a triangular roof, inclined to the horizon at an angle of 7°. In this roof, directly above the driver’s head, there was a hatch through which he could get into and leave the tank. This type of gable nose was given the name “humped nose” by the designers (however, the name “pike nose” stuck more firmly).

The transition to a fully welded hull with the exception of large cast parts was explained, on the one hand, by the achievements of welders led by Academician E.O. Paton, on the other hand, by the capabilities of the foundry, which was fully loaded with the production of cast turrets for IS-2 tanks.

1 - 122 mm gun; 2 - tower eye; 3 - gunner's observation device; 4 - DShK machine gun; 5 - turret; 6 - external fuel tank; 7 - drive wheel; 8 - support roller; 9 - drive wheel cleaner; 10-supporting roller; 11 - balancer stop; 12 - caterpillar track; 13 - loader observation device; 14 - turret hatch cover; 15 - commander’s observation device; 16 - earrings for self-pulling; 17 - antenna input; 18 - gun mask; 19 - mounting bracket for the gun in a traveling manner; 20 spare tracks. The DShK machine gun is not shown in the top view. All detailing is done on a scale of M1:25

On October 28, 1944, the first sample of the new ChKZ tank left the factory gates and underwent sea trials on the Brodokalmaksky tract. During the run, an oil leak was discovered from the gearbox, and the car was returned to the workshop. Only in November this tank was allowed to undergo factory 1000-km tests, which again ended in failure. It became clear to ChKZ designers and technologists that some of the planned changes could significantly complicate serial production and further operation of the tank. Therefore, they decided to abandon the 620 hp V-11 engine, which greatly overstressed the transmission, and not to change the existing design of the chassis, power plant and transmission of the IS-2 tank, limiting themselves only to improving the armor protection.

On November 25, 1944, ChKZ produced a second prototype, which the military acceptance team called “Sample A” and the plant called “Kirovets-1.” Soon, in accordance with the order of the commander of the BT and MV spacecraft, it received the official name “heavy tank IS-3 (sample No. 1).”

After completion of factory tests, the tank was sent to the NIIBT testing ground to undergo state tests, which were carried out from December 18 to 24. At the same time, he was examined by the deputy commander of the armored and mechanized forces of the Red Army, Marshal of the Armored Forces P.A. Rotmistrov. He walked around the car from all sides, climbed up, climbed inside the tank, sat in the driver’s seat and, after listening to a detailed report from the lead engineer of the car, M.F. Balzhi, said:

This is the kind of car the army needs!

At the same time, Experimental Plant No. 100 and TsNII-48 presented their project for modernizing the IS-2 armor protection to the NKTP. In this regard, the Moscow branch of TsNII-48 conducted a comparative analysis of the two projects and came to the conclusion that the best solution to the issue of enhancing the armor protection of the IS-2 tank is to create a design that will make maximum use of the advantages of both options. In particular, the new armor protection of the IS tank could include the bow of the hull according to the type proposed by Plant No. 100 and TsNII-48 (gable nose); the bottom of the hull is according to the ChKZ version (trough-shaped); in the cross section of the tower, the principle proposed by ChKZ could be used (dome-shaped), and in horizontal sections, the towers of plant No. 100 and TsNII-48 could be used (section approaching an ellipse).

Approximate calculations showed that using these proposals it was possible to create (within the tank mass specified by the Kirov Plant and Plant No. 100) an armor protection design that would reduce the probability of penetration of the hull when fired by 88-mm shells to 34% versus 39.5 % at the building of plant No. 100 - TsNII-48, and 44.1% at the building of the Kirov plant.

Two independent projects, two variants of one tank, were submitted for consideration to the People's Commissar of the Tank Industry V.A. Malyshev. The first was represented by the director of ChKZ I.M. Zaltsman and the chief designer N.L. Dukhov, the second by the director and chief designer of the Experimental Plant Zh.Ya. Kotin. Having examined the projects and taking into account the recommendations of TsNII-48, V.A. Malyshev issued order No. 729 of December 16, 1944, which determined the further progress of work on the creation of the tank. The machine was already officially assigned the index “Kirovets-1”. The work schedule was approved and the volume of the pilot batch was determined - 10 pieces. Moreover, 8 of them needed to be assembled by January 25, 1945.

Thus was born a new model of a breakthrough tank - the fruit of the joint efforts of two Kirov design teams, which, in principle, are impossible to separate. Before the establishment of the Pilot Plant, the main team of designers worked in the state and on the territory of ChKZ and only later was partially reassigned to the Pilot Plant. However, this staff for the most part was located and worked at the main plant, continuing to carry out design and production tasks at ChKZ.

In the work calendar of ChKZ director I.M. Zaltsman, where he marked the completion of the work schedule, the new machine was named “Pobeda”. But no matter how much he wanted to give “his” car a big name, the tank went into production under the already familiar name - IS-3. The only thing that the serial plant achieved was that the object number for the tank was assigned to the Chelyabinsk Kirov Plant - object 703.

1 - emergency exit hatch; 2 - plug for draining water; 3 - engine hatch cover; 4 - hatch cover for draining fuel from the left tanks; 5 - hatch cover under the main clutch release mechanism; 6 - plugs for draining oil from the PMP; 7 - plug for draining oil from the gearbox; 8 - hatch cover for draining oil from the oil tank and fuel from the right tanks; 9-armor box of the heater boiler; 10-hole plug for exhaust gases of the heater lamp

By February 12, 1945, ChKZ completed the assembly of two hulls of the IS-3 tank (No. 2 and No. 3), which were sent to the NIIBT test site for shelling tests. And the first IS-3 was presented with military acceptance on February 20 and sent to Moscow. Its field tests were carried out from March 23 to April 11 in Kubinka. After the tests, the tank was presented to G.K. Zhukov and A.M. Vasilevsky. The marshals reported about the new vehicle to I.V. Stalin, who signed the GKO decision No. 7950ss on the adoption of the tank by the Red Army and its production at the Chelyabinsk Kirov Plant. On May 21, the head of the Technical Department of the GBTU of the Red Army, A.I. Blagonravov, signed the order “On approval of technical documentation for the IS-3 tank.” As of May 24, 29 IS-3 tanks had been assembled, of which only 17 passed factory tests.

The IS-3 heavy tank (object 703) had very advanced hull and turret shapes for its time with large thicknesses of armor plates. The frontal plates of the hull were installed in the shape of a “pike nose” with a double slope at a large angle to the vertical. The upper part of the side was given a reverse slope to accommodate the wide turret ring. Inclined armor plates at the junction of the sides and bottom made it possible to reduce the total surface area of ​​the hull and, due to the saved weight, enhance armor protection. The hull aft sheet was made folding for easy access to the power transmission units.

The driver was located in front along the axis of the car. Above his seat there was a hatch with a lid that moved to the side, in which a viewing device was installed. Before opening the hatch, it had to be removed. Behind the driver's seat, in the bottom, there was an emergency hatch.

The cast tower had a flattened spherical shape. There was a large oval hatch in the roof of the tower, closed with two lids. The loader's viewing device - MK-4 - was placed in the right cover; on the left was the commander's observation hatch, closed by a round rotating lid in which the TPK-1 commander's viewing device was mounted.

This device was intended to monitor the terrain, determine the range to the target, target designation and adjust artillery fire. The tank did not have a developed commander's cupola. Another MK-4 device, for the gunner, was installed in the upper part of the turret, to the left along the direction.

The turret rotation mechanism is planetary, with manual and electric stepless drives. The electric drive was equipped with a commander's control system. The commander could, keeping the target in the field of view of his viewing device, press a button mounted on the device and turn the turret in a given direction along the shortest path. When the line of sight coincided with the axis of the bore, the turret stopped. The maximum turret rotation speed was 12 degrees/s.

A 122-mm D-25T tank gun model 1943 with a barrel length of 48 calibers and a coaxial 7.62-mm DT machine gun were installed in a cast mantlet. The gun was equipped with a two-chamber muzzle brake and a horizontal wedge breech with semi-automatic mechanical type. The initial speed of the armor-piercing projectile was 781 m/s. The target firing range (using the TSh-17 telescopic sight) was 5,000 m, and using the side level - 15,000 m. The rate of fire was 2-3 rounds/min.

On the roof of the turret, on a turret, there was an anti-aircraft 12.7-mm DShK machine gun.

The gun's ammunition consisted of 28 separate-loading rounds, including: 18 with high-explosive fragmentation shells and 10 with armor-piercing shells. It should be noted that to make it easier for the loader to orient himself, all the mountings intended to accommodate armor-piercing projectiles were painted black, and the rest were painted steel gray.

The ammunition for the DT machine gun consisted of 945 rounds of ammunition loaded into 15 magazines, and for the DShK machine gun - of 5 belts of 50 rounds each, each of which was placed in a separate box. One box was installed on the machine gun, the rest were located in the fighting compartment.

Twelve-cylinder four-stroke V-shaped diesel engine V-11-IS-3 liquid cooled with a displacement of 38,880 cm3 and a maximum power of 520 hp. (382.5 kW) at 2200 rpm. was installed on brackets welded to the side plates of the hull.

1 - hatch cover; 2 - bracket glass; 3 - spring; 4 - bracket; 5 - roller; 6 - profile cam; 7 - clamp; 8 - folding handle for turning the lid; 9- axis of the hatch cover; 10 - guide sleeve; 11 - stopper ring; 12 - handle; 13 - rubber band; 14 - lock bolt; 15 - bracket; 16 - folding handles

The tank's fuel system included four internal tanks with a total capacity of 450 liters, located two to the right and left of the engine. Four external cylindrical tanks with a capacity of 90 liters each were mounted on inclined hull sheets along the sides of the aft part and were connected to the internal ones. The tanks had mechanical release devices (cable-operated latches). The release handles were installed on the sides of the rear part of the fighting compartment.

Power transmission is mechanical. The main clutch is multi-disc, dry (steel over asbestos bakelite). Gearbox (Gearbox) - eight-speed, with range. The planetary rotation mechanisms were two-stage, located at the ends of the main gearbox shaft. PMP locking clutches are multi-disc, dry (steel on steel). Floating, band brakes (cast iron on steel). Final drives are reduction gearboxes with a simple gear and planetary set.

The drive wheels had removable rims with 14 teeth. The idler wheel was interchangeable with the road wheels. The track tensioning mechanism is screw and crank.

On each side there were six double road wheels and three support rollers. The suspension of the rollers is individual, torsion bar. The caterpillar is fine-linked, pinion geared. The nominal number of tracks in each track is 86, the minimum is 79. The tracks are connected by an open hinge. Track pitch - 160 mm, width - 650 mm. The track was a casting or shaped stamping.

The tank was equipped with a 10-RK-26 radio station and a TPU-4bisF tank intercom.

As mentioned above, the first batch of IS-3 heavy tanks left the factory floors at the end of May 1945. They did not take part in the hostilities of the Great Patriotic War and the war with Japan.

The first display of these combat vehicles to the world community took place only on September 7, 1945 in Berlin during the parade of the Allied forces in honor of the end of World War II.

The parade was hosted by the Commander-in-Chief of the Soviet occupation forces, Marshal G.K. Zhukov, the commander of the 3rd American Army, General George Patton, the English General Robertson and the French General Koenig. In addition, a large number of senior officials from both Soviet and Allied troops were present. The parade was opened by foot columns: infantrymen from the 9th Rifle Corps of the 5th Soviet Shock Army marched in front of the general's stand, followed by soldiers from the 2nd French Infantry Division, Alpine Riflemen and Zouaves, and the 131st British Infantry Brigade showed off its bearing. Closing the line on foot were a thousand paratroopers from the American 82nd Airborne Division. After a short break, a mechanized column approached the spectators, which was opened by 32 M24 General Chaffee light tanks and 16 M8 armored vehicles from the American 705th Tank Battalion, followed by tanks and armored personnel carriers of the French 1st Tank Division. The British fielded 24 Comet tanks and 30 armored vehicles of the 7th Tank Division in the parade. And finally, at the end of the parade, 52 IS-3 tanks marched along the Charlottenburg Highway. The consolidated tank regiment was formed on the basis of the 71st Guards Heavy Tank Regiment of the 2nd Guards Tank Army. The new Soviet heavy tanks made a shocking impression on our Western allies.

The IS-3 tank was in serial production until mid-1946 (in May 1945, for some time, together with the IS-2).

A total of 2,311 tanks were produced.

The IS-3 was in service with heavy self-propelled tank regiments of the Soviet Army. The baptism of fire of these vehicles as part of the Soviet Army took place in 1956 in Hungary. In this case, several tanks were lost.

However, already at the very beginning of their operation among the troops, a number of shortcomings emerged that were the result of a number of design miscalculations and errors made during its design. Therefore, already in 1946, a commission was created to analyze the defects of the IS-3, which included failure of the engine, gearbox, armored hull elements in the area of ​​the engine-transmission compartment, etc.

In 1948-1952, all IS-3 tanks were subjected to modernization and alterations under the UKN program (elimination of design deficiencies). The engine mounting brackets were strengthened, the gearbox mount was changed, the turret plate was strengthened, the design of the main clutch was improved, and the seals of the final drives and road wheels were improved. Instead of a manual oil pump, an electric one is installed. Radio station 10-RK was replaced by 10-RT. The weight of the tank increased to 48.8 tons. Despite the significant amount of alterations and the high cost of work (the UKN program for one tank cost 260,000 rubles), the tanks were never brought to the required level of operating requirements.

At the end of the 1950s, the tank underwent additional modernization and became known as the IS-ZM. The purpose of modernization was to bring it to the level of combat vehicles of that period and the maximum possible unification of components and assemblies with more modern tanks. At the same time, the following changes and additions were made to the design of the tank: the rigidity of the hull was increased by introducing slats into the rear plate and braces in the bottom; a hole was cut in the bottom under the gearbox and closed with a cover welded on an overlay to increase the gap between the gearbox and the bottom; the DShK machine gun was replaced with the modernized DShKM, and the DT machine gun with the DTM; the rotating hood of the commander's hatch is sealed; a night vision device TVN-2 for the driver was installed; Instead of the V-11-IS-3, the V-54K-IS engine with a maximum power of 520 hp is installed. Air cleaners of the “Multicyclone” type have been replaced with VTI-2 with two degrees of purification and injection-based dust removal from the first stage. A new oil tank with a heat exchanger and a defoamer is installed in the lubrication system. The cooling system has a built-in heater NIKS-1 with an electric drive; at the stern there is provision for mounting two 200-liter barrels of fuel; The bearing units of the track rollers and idler wheels have been strengthened, and the oil seals have been changed; A two-wire emergency lighting circuit has been introduced into the electrical equipment system. An external trigger socket is mounted at the stern. The commander's control system was removed from some of the tanks. Direct-acting instrumentation has been replaced by electric ones; R-113 radio stations and R-120 tank intercoms were installed.

It should be emphasized that the modernization has significantly increased the reliability of the tank. However, his life was already over. After modernization, the tanks were sent to parks, where they were placed in long-term storage.

1 - torsion rollers; 2 - tank commander’s viewing device; 3 - cover of the commander's observation hatch; 4 - grips; 5 - copiers of the commander’s turret control device; 6 - left turret hatch cover; 7 - right turret hatch cover; 8 - handles; 9 - loader viewing device; 10- anti-aircraft gun turret mounting grip

In 1946, two tanks were transferred to Poland to familiarize themselves with the design and train instructors. Apparently, it was intended to be adopted by the Polish Army. In the 1950s, both vehicles participated in military parades several times. Subsequently, until the early 1970s, one vehicle was located at the Military Technical Academy in Warsaw, and then was used as a target at one of the training grounds. The second IS-3 was more fortunate - it was transferred to the Higher Officer School of Tank Forces named after S. Charnetsky, in whose museum it is still kept. In 1950, one IS-3 tank was transferred to Czechoslovakia for a similar testing purpose.

Significantly more IS-3 tanks were sent to the DPRK (after the end of the Korean War). In the 1960s, two North Korean tank divisions each had one regiment of heavy tanks.

The Egyptian army received its first IS-3 tanks in the mid-1950s. On July 23, 1956, they took part in the Independence Day parade in Cairo. Most of the 100 IS-3 and IS-ZM delivered to Egypt arrived in this country in 1962-1967.

On June 5, 1967, Israeli troops went on the offensive in the Sinai Peninsula - the war, called the “six-day” war, began. The decisive role in operations on the land front was played by tank and mechanized formations, the bulk of which on the Israeli side were American tanks M48A2 with 90-mm cannons, English Centurion Mk5 and Mk7, modernized in Israel by installing a 105-mm cannon, as well as modernized M4 Sherman tanks with French 105-mm cannons. On the Egyptian side they were opposed by Soviet-made tanks: T-34-85, T-54, T-55 and IS-3. The latter, in particular, were part of the 7th Infantry Division, which occupied the defense at the Khan Yunis - Rafah line. The 125th Tank Brigade, whose positions were located near El-Kuntilla, had another 60 IS-3s.

Soviet-made heavy tanks (like all others) could become a serious threat to the Israelis. However, this did not happen, although several M48s were shot down by them. In conditions of highly maneuverable combat, the IS-3 was inferior to the more modern Israeli tanks. The low rate of fire, limited ammunition and a hopelessly outdated fire control system had an effect (for comparison, the M48A2 had an optical rangefinder sight and a two-plane guidance stabilizer). The IS-3 engines were also poorly suited for operation in hot climates. But, most importantly, the combat training of Egyptian tank crews was much lower than that of Israeli tank crews. The low general educational level of the bulk of the personnel affected, which made it difficult to master military equipment. The morale of the soldiers, who did not show the necessary fortitude and perseverance, was also low.

The last circumstance is well illustrated by a unique point of view of tank battle, but a typical episode for the “six-day” war. One IS-ZM was hit in the Rafah area by a hand grenade that accidentally flew into... an open turret hatch. Egyptian tank crews went into battle with open hatches in order to be able to quickly leave the tank if it was defeated.

The soldiers of the 125th Tank Brigade, retreating, simply abandoned their tanks, including the IS-ZM, which the Israelis received in completely serviceable condition. As a result, the Egyptian army lost 73 IS-3 and IS-ZM tanks. By 1973, it had only one tank regiment of these combat vehicles. There is no information about his participation in hostilities.

The IDF used captured IS-ZMs until the early 1970s. At the same time, worn-out V-54K-IS engines were replaced with V-54s from captured T-54A tanks. At the same time, the roof of the engine and transmission compartment was borrowed from the latter. By the Arab-Israeli War of 1973, most IS-ZMs were installed as fixed firing points dug into the ground along the Suez Canal. During the fighting they did not play any significant role and again fell into the hands of the Egyptians.

This ends the only full-fledged episode of combat use in the fate of the IS-3 heavy tank.

In terms of its tactical and technical characteristics, the IS-3 was certainly superior to its predecessor, the IS-2 tank. “IS-Third” also received very flattering reviews abroad. According to West German expert Dr. Von Senger und Etterlin, “the rational design of the bow of the hull and turret deserves the highest praise. In addition, this tank has a very low height. For 1956, the IS-3 tank retains the best combination of combat qualities for a heavy vehicle.”

All this is true, but the listed design flaws negatively affected the combat capabilities of the tank. Despite the implementation of two modernization programs, they were never completely eliminated.

IN ideo:

Noticed a mistake? Select it and click Ctrl+Enter to let us know.



The fate of the IS-3 heavy tank is far from simple and ambiguous. Although it was called the “Tank of Victory” - it was he who had the honor of passing defeated Berlin in the joint military parade of the participants of the anti-Hitler coalition - however, he was definitely late to the battlefields of the Great Patriotic War. Moreover, it was assumed that after the war the IS-3 would become the basis of the power of the Soviet tank forces, but due to military-style short development times, it turned out to be unfinished, unreliable in everyday use and, being subjected to damage in the 1940s - 1950s. constant modernization, spent more time at repair plants and storage bases than in combat units.

Heavy tank IS-3

Nevertheless, there is no doubt that the IS-3 tank had a great influence on the entire post-war world tank building with its design solutions and original rational forms.

By 1943, the leadership of Nazi Germany managed to ensure the rearmament of the Wehrmacht. This was especially evident in the example of tank and anti-tank formations. New “tigers”, “panthers”, “Ferdinands” appeared, and anti-tank artillery, instead of the 37 mm and 45 mm guns with which it entered the war against the USSR, received 75 mm and 88 mm caliber guns. In addition to conventional caliber armor-piercing shells, their ammunition already included sub-caliber and cumulative ones. As a result, the armor penetration of German anti-tank weapons increased significantly, for the first time since the beginning of the war, surpassing the level of armor protection of heavy tanks in service with our army.
In addition, the tactics of German units also changed, especially the principles of building tactical defense. So, if back in 1942 the defense of units was formed by a system of strong points, echeloned in depth by only 3 - 4 km, now it has become continuous, and the depth of only its main zone was 10 - 15 km.

The sad consequence of these innovations was the significant losses suffered by the Soviet armored forces in 1944. The development and adoption of a new powerful breakthrough tank by the Red Army was required.

The heavy tank IS-1 (“Joseph Stalin”) with an 85-mm gun, adopted by Decree No. 4043, became such a vehicle. State Committee Defense on September 4, 1943, as well as the IS-2 with a 122 mm gun, adopted by GKO Resolution No. 4479 of October 31, 1943.
IS series tanks were urgently put into production at the Chelyabinsk Kirov Plant (ChKZ). The need for them was so great that by the next Resolution of December 27, 1943, the State Defense Committee obliged the People's Commissariat of Tank Industry (NKTP) to increase the production of IS-2 tanks and self-propelled guns on its basis to 300 units per month.


Captured Soviet heavy tank IS-3 at a military parade in Jerusalem. 1968

However, the haste in design and development, as well as the feverish speed with which they were put into mass production, had a negative impact on the quality of the vehicles produced. During the operation of the IS-2, significant design flaws were revealed. The transmission turned out to be especially unreliable - the gearbox, the main clutch. Only 40% of the vehicles produced passed the acceptance tests from the first presentation; the rest were subject to military acceptance for revision. In the spirit of that time, NKTP Order No. 235 dated April 15, 1944 even stated that if the quality of products produced at ChKZ did not improve, then plant officials would be held strictly accountable.
To rectify the situation and improve the quality of manufactured IS-2s, the leadership of the People's Commissariat took extraordinary measures - from December 1943, every fiftieth tank produced had to be tested for an acceptance mileage of 300 km, and one vehicle from the monthly program was subject to a warranty mileage of 1000 km .

On April 8, 1944, the following GKO Resolution No. 5583 “On the production of a prototype of a new heavy tank at the Kirov Plant” was issued. dedicated to issues improvement and modernization of IS-2.
In addition to the poor manufacturing quality of the tanks, this decision was also caused by the need to take measures to strengthen their armor protection. At the beginning of 1944, an analysis of the combat damage to these vehicles showed that the cast frontal plates of the hulls were penetrated by armor-piercing shells of the 88-mm Tiger guns from a distance of 1000 - 1200 m, and by 75-mm Panther shells from a distance of 900 - 1000 m. Therefore, the Main Armored Directorate (GBTU) demanded that the armor protection of the IS-2 be significantly strengthened so that the frontal part of the hull and turret, as well as the side armor of the turret box, would not be damaged from any distance.


We can say that the release of this GKO Resolution is the starting point in the history of the tank, later named IS-3 (“object 703”), which is, in fact, the result of a deep modernization of the IS-2.
On April 18, the NKTP presented a list of measures to improve the quality of IS tanks, which included more than twenty points, the main of which were:

1.
a) To enhance the armor protection of the tank, replace the existing cast structure of the tank’s nose with a rolled welded one, ensuring that it is impenetrable in the working position (of the tank) by armor-piercing and sub-caliber shells from the cannons of the Panther and Tiger tanks from all distances.
b) Change the design and increase the thickness of the front part of the tower, making it equal in strength to the bow.
2. Ensure compaction of the feed sheet.
3. Change the ammunition rack.
4. Install a large-caliber machine gun for firing at anti-aircraft targets.
5. Install the rolling bearings of the gun trunnions.
6. Remove the fuel tanks from the control compartment.
7. Strengthen the main clutch.”
In accordance with this document, the joint order of the People's Commissar of the Tank Industry and the Commander of the Armored Forces No. 333с/083с dated May 19, 1944, the ChKZ management undertook to carry out work to introduce the necessary improvements into the design of the IS-2 tank, and by June 25 to assemble two prototypes of the modernized tank and two improved ISU-152 self-propelled guns based on it with the introduction of all the required changes to the units of these vehicles. M. Balzhi was appointed lead engineer of the modernized IS-2 project.

IS-2 heavy tank with a straightened frontal hull plate mounted at an angle of 60°, which significantly increased the armor resistance of the tank

In their work to enhance the protection of the tank, ChKZ designers relied on the recommendations of TsNII-48, which was then dealing with issues of armor protection, taken taking into account the requirements of the military, on the one hand, and the technological capabilities of the factories, on the other. The option of strengthening the bow of the hull proposed by TsNII-48 was implemented relatively simply, replacing the cast part with the same one, but made of rolled armor 90 mm thick, placing it with an inclination of 60°. However, the turret did not lend itself to a radical increase in armor protection - without a sharp increase in its mass . It was originally designed and balanced to accommodate an 85 mm gun, but it needed to accommodate a much heavier 122 mm gun. The tower had to be redesigned.


IS-3 tanks at the Allied parade

Accordingly, the main measures taken in the process of enhancing the armor protection of the modernized IS-2 were:

Replacing the cast structure of the tank nose with a straight welded one made from rolled sheets with a thickness of 90 - 100 mm;
- thickening of the front part of the turret box to 130 mm;
- changing the design and increasing the thickness of the armor of the front part of the turret to ensure its equal strength with the front part of the hull.
The modernized tank was equipped with a V-11 engine with a power of 625 hp, and the exhaust, cooling, and lubrication systems were redesigned accordingly; changed the design of the main clutch. To reduce the fire hazard, the fuel tanks were moved from the control compartment to the engine and transmission compartment. In total, the design of the modernized IS-2, compared
differences with the production car, thirteen significant changes were made.

Work on the design and assembly of the modernized IS-2 proceeded slowly. The delivery deadline for prototypes - June 25, 1944 - was missed. The main reason became that the management of ChKZ paid the main attention to the construction of a prototype of its own heavy tank - “object 701”, technical project which was presented at GBTU in March of the same year. Subsequently, this particular object received the IS-4 index.
In the second half of August, the drawings of the modernized IS-2 were finally sent to GBTU. Having received a positive conclusion, the assembly of the first machine began on September 2. On October 28, she was presented with military acceptance and sent to the factory training ground. There she made her first test run, interrupted by a breakdown - oil leaked from the gearbox. After repairs, 1000-kilometer factory sea trials began,
which also had to be interrupted due to the accident on November 18.
It was clear that fine-tuning the car could take a lot of time. The fact is that the designers of ChKZ made many significant changes to its design without having time to thoroughly develop and test the new components, as well as analyze their interaction. At-
it was necessary to abandon changes in the power plant, chassis, and transmission. Moreover, the military was quite satisfied with the mobility and maneuverability of the tank with a 520 hp engine.
The next prototype of the IS-2 tank was delivered by the Chelyabinsk plant on November 25, 1944. In the military acceptance documents it received the designation “Sample A”, and at the plant - “Kirovets 1”. During further testing, by order of the Commander of the BT and MB KA, the tank received the name “heavy tank IS-3 (sample No. 1).”

Heavy tank “Object 701” of the design bureau of the Chelyabinsk Kirov Plant, which later received the IS-4 index. 1944

The IS-3 had a number of differences from the previous vehicle. Its hull was entirely welded from rolled armor plates and had no cast armor parts. The bottom is trough-shaped, and the sides are made up of lower and upper vertical parts welded together. The upper nasal sheet, 120 mm thick, and the lower one, 90 mm thick, were located at an angle of 60° to the vertical. The aft part was made of sheets with a thickness of 40 - 60 mm, and the hull roof was made of 20 mm. The selection of thicknesses and rational angles of inclination of the armor plates made the hull practically invulnerable to all calibers of enemy anti-tank artillery and its tank guns.
The main feature of the project is the flattened turret, developed by designer G. Kruchenykh, a completely original technical solution in the world tank building. The rational internal layout of the new turret, made in the form of a spherical segment, made it possible to increase the thickness of the armor without a significant increase in weight. It was cast in one piece. In addition, large angles of inclination of the walls caused anti-tank shells to ricochet.

Video: Soviet heavy tank IS-3

The thickness of the side of its front part reached 170 mm, and in some places reached 360 mm. The roof of the turret consisted of two 30-mm sheets: the front one was made removable to ensure installation of the gun, the rear one had a landing hatch.
The disadvantages of the turret design include the absence of a commander's cupola; because of this, the commander had only one periscope viewing device in the rotating cover of a special hatch.
The IS-3 remained armed with the 122-mm D-25 tank gun and the coaxial 7.62-mm DT. The rear turret machine gun, which was previously on the tank, was abandoned. All ammunition was stored in the turret and hull of the tank.

In the IS-2, the transmission could not cope with transmitting the increased power and often failed. Therefore, its design has undergone changes to increase operational reliability - the number of main clutch disks has been increased, the fastening of the gearbox to the body has been strengthened, and the connections of the planetary turning mechanisms with the gearbox and final drives have been changed.
On December 16, 1944, the tank was officially handed over for state tests, which took place from December 18 to 24 at the NIIBT training ground. The report on their results noted that shelling of the hull of the new vehicle revealed significantly higher armor resistance compared to the hull of the IS-2, and the modernized model is recommended for adoption.

Test drive of the IS-3 tank by Zenkevich

Having received information about the tests of the Kirovets, the chief designer of the Experimental Plant, Zh. Kotin, immediately prepared his own version of the tank, based on the developments of his plant and TsNII-48 for “objects 244, 245, 248”, and presented it in December 1944 to the People's Commissariat of Tank industry its joint project to modernize the armor protection of the IS-2, based on the original shape of the bow of the hull.
The fact is that the designers of the Experimental Plant G. Moskvin and V. Tarotko, who were responsible for the development of armor protection, designed the upper frontal part of the vehicle from two armor plates that were strongly inclined and beveled to the sides. On top they were covered with a triangular roof, inclined at a slight angle. Such a three-slope wedge extended forward was called by the designers “nose with a hump”, or “pike nose”. It should be noted that in both projects, the housing manufacturing technology involved fully automatic welding.
Now the NKTP had two independent projects for the IS tank.
One option was presented by the director of ChKZ I. Zaltsman and the chief designer N. Dukhov, the other by Zh. Kotin. The Moscow branch of TsNII-48 conducted a comparative analysis. His report noted that both projects have their advantages, but the most optimal solution to improving the armor protection of the IS-2 tank would be to create a design that would make the most of the advantages of both.


Experimental tank "Kirovets-1"

To do this you need:
- the bow part of the hull should be made according to the “pike nose” type proposed by Pilot Plant No. 100;
- the bottom of the hull should be taken according to the design of the Kirov plant - “trough-shaped”;
- develop the tower in such a way that the principle of the Kirov Plant (dome-shaped) is used in its cross section, and the principle of the tower of the Experimental Plant No. 100 is used in its horizontal sections (section close to an ellipse).
The leadership of the NKTP made a decision according to which the new tank was to become a synthesis of both models. The project of such a heavy tank based on the IS-2 was assigned to the Kirov plant. On December 16, 1944, NKTP order No. 729 was issued, which determined the course of further work on the creation of a new tank. The index “Kirovets-1” has now been officially assigned to it.
According to this order, eight such vehicles were required to be assembled by January 25, 1945, two more hulls and two turrets were intended for shelling tests.


Tactical and technical characteristics of the tank "Kirovets - 1"

A “collective” version of the tank appeared - the fruit of the design work of two teams of tank builders. Before the formation of Pilot Plant No. 100, the main staff of its designers worked on the ChKZ staff and only later were gradually transferred to the Pilot Plant.
J.V. Stalin always closely monitored the state of affairs in the tank industry, so People's Commissar V. Malyshev sent a letter to Supreme Commander-in-Chief. He gave a rationale for the development of a new heavy tank and described its advantages over the IS-2, arguing that “the proposals of Soviet designers make it possible to create a heavy tank similar to the IS-2 and, at the same time, increase its armor resistance by more than two times compared to the existing one.” IS-2 tank. The hull of the new heavy tank will not be penetrated by the enemy’s most powerful tank and anti-tank artillery when firing from the closest distances at the front of the tank and turret and at the sides at heading angles of maneuvering the tank towards the enemy of up to 60 degrees.” After reading the letter, I.V. Stalin gave his consent.
However, the deadlines specified in order No. 729 were missed. Only by February 12 did ChKZ manage to complete the assembly of two armored hulls (No. 2 and No. 3), which were sent to Kubinka
for shelling tests. And the first IS-3, fully completed and accepted for military acceptance (sample No. 2), which received the factory designation “object 703,” left the factory for the test site on February 20.
The tests were carried out at NIITB from March 23 to April 11. Based on their results, the commission drew up a report and an act in which it recommended the IS-3 (sample No. 2) for production at the Chelyabinsk Kirov Plant. The draft GKO Resolution provided for:

1. Adoption of the new heavy tank of the Kirov plant “Marshal Stalin” into service by the Red Army.
2. Naming the new tank the name “Marshal Stalin”.
3. The start of serial production of Marshal Stalin tanks is proposed to begin in April with the production of 25 pieces, in May - 100 pieces and in June - 250 pieces, that is, to completely switch to the production of Marshal Stalin tanks instead of IS tanks. Serial production of Marshal Stalin tanks will be carried out at a rate of 500 units per month.”
On March 29, 1945, GKO Decree No. 7950 “On the modernization of the IS-2 heavy tank”, signed by I.V. Stalin, was issued:
"1. Accept the proposal of the NKTP Comrade Malysheva and deputy. commander of the BT and MB KA, Comrade Korobkov, on the adoption of the IS-3 tank, designed by the Kirov NKTP plant, into service with the spacecraft.
2. Oblige the NKTP (Comrade Malyshev) and the director of the Kirov plant (Comrade Zaltsman) to eliminate the shortcomings noted in the test report
development of the IS-3 tank before organizing its mass production.”
The change in the name of the tank to “Marshal Stalin” was not mentioned in the Resolution, so it can be assumed that the leader did not like the new name.


IS-3 on one of the Berlin streets. Summer 1945

The order “On the approval of technical documentation for the IS-3 tank” was signed by the head of the GBTU technical department A. Blagonravov on May 21, after the surrender of Germany.
By the end of 1945, 1,705 IS-3 tanks were produced, and in parallel with them, production of IS-2 tanks continued. Serial production of the IS-3 ended at the end of July 1946. A total of 2,305 units were built during this period.
In 1945, N. Dukhov was awarded the extraordinary rank of engineer-major general for his services in creating the IS-3 heavy tank, he was awarded the Order of Suvorov, and soon received the title of Hero of the Soviet Union with the presentation of the Gold Star and the Order of Lenin. In 1946, N. Dukhov, M. Balzhi, engineers G. Kruchenykh (responsible for the internal layout of the IS-3 tank), V. Tarotko and G. Moskvin (developers of the armor scheme) also received state awards for the design of the IS-3.

_______________________________________________________________________________
Data source: Magazine "Armor Collection" 3.10

Soviet researchable heavy tank of the eighth level of World of Tanks - IS 3. According to its tactical and technical parameters, the IS-3 is considered a heavy breakthrough tank.

For a more in-depth understanding of the Soviet heavy aircraft IS-3, it is necessary to fully analyze all the capabilities. IS 3 has good dynamics for a heavy weapon, devastating damage per shot - 390 units, excellent armor and shielded sides.

These features allow you to feel comfortable in any situation on the battlefield. Depending on the position in the team's list, the tank can be used in different ways. With classmates, the IS-3 can break through a direction, confidently dealing damage.

With high-level opponents, the tank can support the attack of teammates. In addition, the heavy can quickly change flanks, performing the function of a medium tank.

Of course, even the famous “pike nose”, which is the hallmark of the third IS, is not without its drawbacks. When placed in a diamond shape, the risk of breaking through the VLD increases. In addition, criticism is caused by the safety margin, the small viewing radius - 350 meters and weak vertical pointing angles of the gun.


The crew of the IS 3 tank consists of 4 people. The choice of pumpable perks for the IS-3 is typical for any heavy tank in the game. For personal skills, you can use the following set:


Sixth Sense is a must-have skill for a commander.
“Smooth rotation of the turret” - useful for the gunner.
“The King of Off-Roads” will help the driver-mechanic.
“Non-contact ammo rack” is ideal for the loader.

Among the required perks, the following skills are pumped out: “Repair Speed”, “Combat Brotherhood”, “Disguise”. Please note that the choice of skills should be a recommendation.

For example, instead of “Disguise” for a driver, you can pump out the “Off-Road King” perk. This will make the tank more visible, but will increase its cross-country ability on difficult soils.

To hide the shortcomings of the machine, it is necessary to choose the right additional equipment. The main task of IS-3 players is to maximize the damage dealt, which, by the way, is 390 units per shot.


In addition, we must not forget about mediocre accuracy, not the best convergence and stabilization times. Therefore, the optimal set of modules will look like this:

  • Rammer.
  • Ventilation.
  • Stabilization of vertical guidance.

It should be clarified that some players prefer to use strengthening the aiming drives, reducing aiming time, against improving all the characteristics of the vehicle. However, such a choice is often unjustified.

The fact is that ventilation gives an additional bonus to all characteristics, including convergence speed. If you level up the “Combat Brotherhood” skill for all crew members, you get a full-fledged bonus, equivalent to using an additional ration. In addition, this reduces the reload time of the gun, which allows you to feel confident in close combat.

Equipment selection


Here, too, everything looks pretty standard for this class of equipment. In particular, the choice for the IS-3 will be as follows:

  1. Fire extinguisher (manual).
  2. Repair kit (small).
  3. First aid kit (small).

Instead of a fire extinguisher, you can opt for an additional ration to get an additional bonus to the skills of tankers.

Most main question for beginners, it is much easier to break through IS 3 in battle. Everything is very simple, a pike nose can easily be penetrated if you know the penetration values ​​of your weapon; the image below shows a detailed designation of the penetration zones of IS 3.

Main places, lower armor plate, shooting in the VLD is advisable only if penetration is more than 205 mm. And the main thing is not to get into the fixed caterpillar track, because it adds 20 mm of armor.

How to play on IS 3

To determine combat tactics on the IS 3, you should start with the fact that the machine is very easy to master even for inexperienced players. In addition, let’s not forget that the “troika” is a first-line vehicle, so there is no need to shoot damage at someone else’s light while hiding in the green.

The tank should be in front, making maximum use of the power of its gun. At the same time, it’s clearly not worth throwing yourself into a pile of enemies in splendid isolation: fireflies and sts will easily “peck” any heavy enemy. In addition, the low accuracy and long aiming times characteristic of the “Soviets” are not conducive to firefights at a distance. Therefore, the ideal conditions for the IS-3 are city maps.

To fully enjoy the high potential of a vehicle, you need to learn how to play armor wisely: stay in cover, substitute a turret, and tank with side screens. By the way, the screens absorb hits not only from classmates, but also from high-level opponents.

If there is a need to leave cover, you should not drive out in a diamond pattern, hoping for a rebound. In this position, the VLD becomes flat, so if it hits, there is guaranteed to be a penetration.

The IS-3 is one of the few tanks in the game that catches ricochets at right angles: the “pike nose” fulfills its function. At the same time, do not forget about dancing: tilting the body from side to side at angles of 5-10 degrees. This technique makes it difficult to target weak points, increases the likelihood of non-penetration and gives time to reload the weapon.

The IS-3 feels good in the clinch, but only with opponents of equal silhouette. When approaching tall vehicles, the IS exposes the roof of the turret, which has only 20 mm of armor. Always remember one important nuance: any tank tanks well with a full safety margin. Therefore, sitting out in the bushes in such a car with 100% health would be simply the height of madness.

IS 3 video


IS-3 is a Soviet heavy tank developed during the Great Patriotic War, which was put into mass production in its last days and did not have time to take part in it. Therefore, this combat vehicle is often considered one of the first post-war Soviet tanks. The abbreviation IS means “Joseph Stalin” - the official name of the series of Soviet heavy tanks produced in 1943-1953. Index 3 corresponds to the third production model of the tank of this family. Due to the characteristic shape of the upper frontal part of the hull, it received the nickname “Pike”.

Tank Is-3 - video

The creation of a project for a new heavy tank, code-named “Kirovets-1,” began in the late summer of 1944. The first experimental batch of IS-3 heavy tanks left the factory floor in May 1945. The gun was equipped with a two-chamber muzzle brake and a horizontal wedge breech with semi-automatic mechanical type. Rate of fire 2-3 rounds/min. The gun's ammunition consisted of 28 separately loaded rounds, including 18 with high-explosive fragmentation shells and 10 with armor-piercing shells. On the roof of the turret, on the turret, there was an anti-aircraft 12.7-mm DShK machine gun. Power reserve - 340 km. The IS-3 tank was in serial production until mid-1946 (in 1945, for some time, together with the IS-2). The IS-3 entered service with the heavy self-propelled tank regiments of the Soviet Army.


When developing the project for the IS-3 tank, the conclusions of the commission were taken into account, which examined combat damage received by tanks during the Battle of Kursk in front-line conditions. The massive damage to the frontal elements of the hull and turret was noteworthy. Therefore, it was decided to develop a new design for the turret and hull on the basis of the IS-2 tank to give them a streamlined shape and sharply differentiate the armor protection. As a result of the design work, the inclination of the welded sheets, especially in the front part of the hull, was brought to the maximum possible. Thick 110-mm plates of frontal armor were positioned in such a way that a three-slope, cone-shaped, elongated forward bow was formed, called the “pike nose.” The hatch was placed in the roof above the driver, which was not the case in the IS-1 and IS-2 tanks. There was no longer a need for a through viewing slit in the frontal armor in front of the driver - it was replaced by periscope viewing devices. New structural forms of armor provided better protection against projectiles. The new, flattened turret design was subsequently used in both the IS-7 and T-10, and also provided significantly better projectile resistance compared to previous turret designs installed on Soviet tanks.


Modifications

IS-3M- modernized version of IS-3.

IS-3K- command version of the IS-3 tank, equipped with an additional radio station R-112 and charger AB-1-P/30.

IS-3MK- command version of the IS-3M tank with the same equipment as on the IS-3K.

Design

The IS-3 had a classic layout, with the engine and transmission compartment located in the rear, the control compartment in the front, and the combat compartment in the middle. The tank's crew consisted of four people: a driver, a gunner, a loader and a commander.


Armored hull and turret

The IS-3 had powerful and highly differentiated armor protection (for its time in 1945), located at optimal angles of inclination and designed, first of all, to protect against fire from the most powerful modern tank and anti-tank guns in the frontal plane and from fire from most tank guns. and anti-tank guns - primarily from the German 88-mm rifled tank guns 8.8 cm KwK 43 and 7.5 cm KwK 42, and at the same time provided virtually complete protection from the most common towed 75-mm anti-tank guns 7.5 cm Pak 40.

The armored hull of the tank was assembled by welding from rolled sheets of homogeneous armor steel with a thickness of 20, 30, 60, 90 and 110 mm. The frontal armor of the tank was made of armor plates 110 mm thick according to the pattern known as the “pike nose”, and consisted of two left and right upper plates that converged like a wedge, located at an inclination of 56° to the vertical and with a turn of 43°, a lower plate located at an angle 63°, and the roof of the control compartment, located at an angle of 73°. Each of the sides of the hull consisted of two armor plates 90 mm thick: the upper one, located at an angle of 60° and forming a side niche, and the vertical lower one. In addition, the upper part of the sides was covered with 30-mm screens located at an angle of 30°, along with unarmored fenders, which formed additional side niches, accessed from outside the tank. The rear part was assembled from 60-mm armor plates: the lower one, located at an angle of 41°, and several upper ones, which had an angle of 48°. The roof of the hull was made of several 20 mm armor plates. The bottom of the hull, flat in the area of ​​the transmission compartment and “trough-shaped” in the rest of the hull, was stamped and also made of 20-mm armor plate.

The IS-3 turret was a one-piece shaped casting made of homogeneous armor steel and had a nearly flattened hemispherical shape, teardrop-shaped in plan. The thickness of the turret walls at the sides and rear ranged from 220 mm at the bottom to 110 mm at the top, while in the frontal part it reached 255 mm. In general, the tilt angles, ranging from −8° to 35°, were selected in such a way that at any point on the tower walls their horizontal thickness was at least 160 mm. In the front part of the turret there were embrasures for a gun and a coaxial machine gun, covered by a cast armored mask attached to the gun barrel, the thickness of which reached 250 mm.


Armament

The main armament of the IS-3 was a 122-mm rifled tank gun D-25T model 1943, which had a barrel length of 48 calibers / 5852 mm and an initial armor-piercing projectile speed of 800 m/s. The D-25T gun had a horizontal wedge breech with semi-automatic mechanical type, electromagnetic and mechanical triggers. The gun's recoil devices consisted of a hydraulic recoil brake and a hydropneumatic knurler, located above the gun barrel on the left and right, respectively. The gun was mounted in the front part of the turret on trunnions in a coaxial installation with a machine gun, which allowed it to be aimed in a vertical plane using a sector-type mechanism in the range from −3 to +20°.

The twin installation was aimed at the target using a telescopic articulated sight TSh-17, which had a magnification of 4× and a field of view of 15°. In addition, for firing from closed positions, the gun was equipped with a side level and an azimuth indicator.

The gun's ammunition consisted of 28 rounds of separate-case loading with armor-piercing and high-explosive fragmentation cannon steel long grenades. Of the shells, 25 were placed in trays on the sides of the turret, another 3 were on stands in the fighting compartment. Of the cartridges, 6 were placed in stowages on both sides of the driver, 4 were placed on the upper sheets of the hull fender liners, 5 were placed in stowage on the floor of the fighting compartment, the rest were placed in clamp stowages: two - on the partition of the engine compartment and another one - on the starboard side housings. Since high-explosive fragmentation shells were larger in size, only armor-piercing shells could be placed in 11 of the ammunition stowage locations.


The mount paired with the cannon housed a 7.62 mm DTM machine gun. The machine gun's ammunition capacity was 2,000 rounds: 1,200 with a light bullet, 200 with an armor-piercing incendiary bullet, and 600 with a tracer. Of these, 756 rounds were in 12 disc magazines of 63 rounds each, the remaining 1244 were stored in standard closures, not loaded into magazines.

On the roof of the turret, on a ring turret, there was a 12.7-mm anti-aircraft heavy machine gun DShK or DShKM, which had all-round fire at vertical angles from −4 to +84°. The machine gun was equipped with a K-8T collimator sight, designed to fire at air targets moving at speeds of up to 400 km/h at an altitude of up to 400 m. The machine gun could also be used for shooting at ground targets, but its use was associated with a significant risk for the shooter , which for this purpose had to rise waist-deep from the hatch from under the protection of the armor. In the stowed position, the machine gun was removed from the turret and secured on the right side of the turret. The machine gun's ammunition capacity was 300 rounds in 6 belts of 50 each. Of this number, 225 rounds were equipped with B-32 armor-piercing incendiary bullets, and 75 with BZT armor-piercing incendiary tracer bullets. Also in the crew compartment there were 25 defensive F-1 grenades or offensive RG-42 grenades and two 7.62 mm PPS-43 submachine guns and 1000 rounds of ammunition for them.


Surveillance and communications equipment

In non-combat conditions, the driver monitored the terrain from his hatch, but in combat he used the MK-4 periscope viewing device - a copy of the British Mk.IV, which gave all-round visibility. The device was designed to be easily removable and had to be removed before opening the driver's hatch cover. Tanks upgraded to the IS-3M standard also had the TVN-1 passive night vision device, which could be installed in place of the MK-4 or on a separate stand when driving with the hatch open. The driver's viewing instrument has also been redesigned, eliminating unnecessary all-round visibility from the driver's seat. The tank commander, gunner and loader also each had one MK-4 device, which was placed on the roof of the turret. When upgrading to the IS-3M standard, the commander's MK-4 was replaced by the TPK-1 binocular device, which was more suitable for this purpose, providing 1x or 5x magnification.

For external communications, the IS-3 had a simplex telephone-telegraph radio station 10RK-26, located in the tank turret to the left of the gun and equipped with a whip antenna 1 to 4 m long. 10RK-26 provided telephone communications at a range of up to 35-40 km from a standstill and 20-25 km on the move. For internal communication, a TPU-4-bis-F telephone tank intercom was installed on the tank for all crew members, connected to a radio station.


IS-3 tank rear view on Shikotan Island. Kuril Islands, Cape "Edge of the World"

Engine and transmission

The IS-3 was equipped with a V-shaped 12-cylinder four-stroke liquid-cooled diesel engine model B-11, which developed a power of 520 hp. With. The engine power system included four fuel tanks with a total capacity of 425 liters, located in the engine compartment on the sides of the engine and in the internal fender niches, as well as four external cylindrical fuel tanks located on the roof of the engine compartment, with a capacity of 90 liters of fuel. The engine cooling system consisted of two plate-tubular radiators located in a semicircle above the main clutch, on the shaft of which the fans were mounted. To facilitate starting in the cold season, the engine was equipped with a heating device.

The IS-3 transmission included:

— multi-disc main dry friction clutch (ferodo steel) with servo drive;
— mechanical four-way four-speed gearbox with reduction gear;
— two onboard turning mechanisms, consisting of a planetary gear set, stopping drums, a multi-disc dry friction clutch (steel on steel) and a band brake;
— two planetary final drives.


IS-3 tank front view on Shikotan Island. Kuril Islands, Cape "Edge of the World"

Chassis

The IS-3 chassis on each side consisted of a drive wheel, an idler, six twin cast non-rubberized support rollers with a diameter of 550 mm and three twin rubber-coated cast support rollers with a diameter of 385 mm. The suspension of the road wheels is individual, torsion bar, without shock absorbers.

IS-3 caterpillar - 650 mm wide, steel, fine-linked, pinion gear, with an open metal hinge. The caterpillar of each side consisted of 86 tracks, at first - of 43 ridge and 43 flat, but since 1947, tank tracks began to be assembled only from ridge tracks.

Vehicles based on IS-3

- ISU-152 model 1945 (Object 704; should not be confused with ISU-152 model 1944, created on the basis of the IS-2) - an experimental self-propelled gun, with a 152-mm howitzer-cannon ML-20SM as the main weapon. 1 prototype produced.


Contrary to popular belief found in outdated sources, IS-3 tanks were not used in the fighting of World War II, but it was these combat vehicles in the amount of 52 that took part in the Berlin parade of the Allied forces on September 7, 1945 in honor of the victory in World War II in part of the Red Army, where they made a strong impression on the Western allies of the USSR in the anti-Hitler coalition. There is also an opinion that the IS-3 could have been used during the fighting against Japan in August 1945 as part of combat testing. IS-3s were used in the suppression of the Hungarian uprising of 1956. There were only a few vehicle losses. The Hungarian events became the only episode of the IS-3’s participation in combat operations as part of the USSR Armed Forces.

Other countries

IS-3s were practically not supplied to the USSR's allies under the Warsaw Pact. Two tanks were transferred to Poland in 1946 to familiarize themselves with the design of the vehicle and train instructors. Subsequently, the tanks were used in parades and as training tanks until the 1970s. Another tank was transferred to Czechoslovakia in 1950.

— The largest number of IS-3s was delivered to Egypt, which received a total of 100 vehicles of both the basic modification and the IS-3M. The first of them arrived in the late 1950s, but the bulk of the tanks were delivered in 1962-1967. As part of the Egyptian army, the IS-3 was used during the Six-Day War of 1967. The IS-3 did not achieve significant success during that war, being, as a rule, in the hands of poorly trained crews and operating in a highly maneuverable war against more mobile and generally modern enemy tanks, which also had a much higher rate of fire, such as the Centurion. or M48, although the last few IS-3s were still knocked out. During the retreat, the Egyptian troops simply abandoned their tanks, including the IS-3; in total, the Egyptians lost 72 tanks of this type in that war, more than half of which were abandoned in good condition. By the Yom Kippur War of 1973, the Egyptian army still had one regiment equipped with the IS-3, but there is no information about its participation in that war.

A number of vehicles knocked out or abandoned by the Egyptians in 1967 were captured by the Israel Defense Forces and operated as part of their own armored forces until the early 1970s, both as combat vehicles and tank tractors. Some of the tanks received B-54 diesel engines removed from T-54/55 tanks instead of their own worn-out engines, and often the roof of the engine compartment was also transferred. The Israelis did not use the IS-3 as tanks in combat, but several vehicles with the engine and transmission removed, in place of which additional ammunition was placed, were used in 1969-1970 during the War of Attrition as fixed firing points, two of them After expending the ammunition, they were recaptured by Egyptian troops.

A significant number of IS-3s were transferred to the DPRK; in the 1960s, the Korean People's Army had at least two regiments armed with them.


Performance characteristics of the IS-3

Crew, people: 4
Developer: KB ChTZ
Years of production: 1945-1946
Years of operation: 1945-1969
Number of issued, pcs.: 1555
Layout scheme: classic
Main operators: USSR, North Korea, Egypt

IS-3 weight

IS-3 Dimensions

— Case length, mm: 6900
— Length with gun forward, mm: 9850
— Case width, mm: 3150
— Height, mm: 2450
— Ground clearance, mm: 450

IS-3 armor

— Armor type: Cast and rolled steel
— Body forehead (top), mm/deg.: 110 / 72°
— Body forehead (middle), mm/deg.: 110 / 55°+43° (Double tilt)
— Body forehead (bottom), mm/deg.: 110 / 63°
— Hull side (top), mm/deg.: 90 / 60° +30 / 30°
— Hull side (bottom), mm/deg.: 90 / 0..60°
— Hull stern (top), mm/deg.: 60 / 48°
— Hull rear (bottom), mm/deg.: 60 / 41°
— Bottom, mm: 20
— Housing roof, mm: 20
— Tower forehead, mm/deg.: 250
— Gun mask, mm/deg.: 250
— Tower side, mm/deg.: 110…220 / 0…60°
— Tower feed, mm/deg.: 110…220 / 0…60°
— Tower roof, mm: 20 / 82…90°

Armament of the IS-3

— Caliber and brand of gun: 122 mm D-25T mod. 1943
— Gun type: rifled tank gun
— Barrel length, calibers: 48
— Gun ammunition: 28
— Angles VN, degrees: -3…+20°
— GN angles, degrees: 360°
— Firing range, km: about 15
— Sights: telescopic articulated TSh-17, Hertz panorama, side level
— Machine guns: 1 × 12.7 mm DShK, 1 × 7.62 mm DTM

IS-3 engine

— Engine type: V-11-IS3
— Engine power, l. p.: 520

IS-3 speed

— Highway speed, km/h: 40
— Speed ​​over rough terrain, km/h: 16 on virgin soil

— Cruising range on the highway, km: 315
— Cruising range over rough terrain, km: 150 on virgin soil
— Specific power, l. s./t: 11.2
— Suspension type: individual torsion bar
— Specific ground pressure, kg/cm²: 0.85…0.87
— Climbability, degrees: 32
— Wall to be overcome, m: 1.0
— Overcoming ditch, m: 2.5
— Fordability, m: 1.4

Photo IS-3